Managing compassion: Designing the 65+ volunteer registry in children's hospitals through the lens of psychological contract and emotional labour theories 

Think Piece Author: Dr Isidora D. Mytilinaiou, Social Researcher 

Introduction: 

 Volunteering stands as the foundation of civil society, especially in challenging times marked by evolving social norms, increasing healthcare demands, and demographic shifts. ‘Strengthening Civil Society in Challenging Times’, IVCO’s 2025 topic, encourages reflection on how volunteer programs might flourish in challenging environments. An up-to-date example is the creation of a 65+ Volunteer Registry for Greek children’s hospitals. It tackles two interrelated issues: how to properly incorporate older adult volunteers into delicate child care settings and how to handle the relational dynamics and emotional labour these positions need. 

This think piece examines how hospitals and elderly volunteers can negotiate roles, expectations, and support in emotionally charged environments by drawing on theories of emotional labour and psychological contract. The objective is to demonstrate how research-informed design may support the development of volunteer programs that are genuinely inclusive of the needs and abilities of older persons, relationally aware, and emotionally sustainable. 

Theoretical foundations: two complementary lenses 

Psychological contract theory concerns the unwritten, often tacit promises volunteers perceive between themselves and organisations. Unlike formal contracts, these ‘psychological contracts’ govern expectations about roles, support, recognition, and reciprocity. When organisations fail to meet these expectations — for instance, by providing unclear roles or insufficient support — volunteers experience ‘contract breach’, leading to dissatisfaction or withdrawal. In volunteering, this dynamic is crucial because motivations are often intrinsic and relational rather than transactional. Clear mutual expectations help prevent misunderstandings and build trust.  

Emotional labour theory addresses the effort volunteers expend managing their emotions and outward expressions to meet organisational ‘feeling rules’. In children’s hospitals, this labour is intense: volunteers provide comfort to sick children and families, maintain calm amid distress, and suppress personal discomfort. Emotional labour is demanding and, if unsupported, can lead to stress or compassion fatigue. Unlike paid healthcare workers, volunteers rarely receive structured emotional training or supervision — yet the expectations placed on them are comparable. Recognising and supporting this emotional work is vital for sustaining volunteer engagement and wellbeing. 

Translating theory into practice: Designing the 65+ Volunteer Registry  

  • Create a clear and transparent expectation framework. Volunteers ought to receive comprehensive role descriptions that detail specific tasks, time commitments, emotional demands, supervision arrangements, and benefits such as training. During registration, it is recommended that volunteers and hospital coordinators formalise a mutual expectations agreement explicitly defining their respective responsibilities. This process transforms implicit assumptions into clear commitments, preventing misunderstandings and fostering trust. 
  • Why this matters: Transparent expectations help prevent volunteers from feeling undervalued or exploited, forming the foundation of a trusting and sustainable volunteer relationship.  
  • Implement precise role matching and flexible tasking. The registry ought to use a hybrid approach of algorithmic matching and human oversight to align volunteer capacities—including mobility, emotional readiness, and availability—with appropriate roles, from storytelling to administrative support. Flexible shift patterns and low-intensity tasks are recommended to accommodate the changing energy needs of older adults. 
  • Why this matters: Proper role alignment enhances volunteer satisfaction and mitigates burnout, ensuring sustained engagement especially among older volunteers. 
  •  Establish robust safeguarding, health clearance, and emergency credentialing procedures. The registry is recommended to streamline background checks, medical clearances, and emergency deployment authorisations to maintain the highest safety standards while minimising bureaucratic obstacles. Compliance with privacy laws and GDPR ought to be integral to all processes. 
  • Why this matters: Safety protocols uphold the psychological contract between volunteers and institutions and protect vulnerable hospital populations.
  • Embed recognition, reciprocity, and continuous feedback loops. Volunteers’ contributions ought to be acknowledged through formal certificates, impact newsletters, and staff briefings. The programme is recommended to facilitate regular feedback opportunities, enabling volunteers to voice concerns and propose improvements, thus cultivating a culture of mutual respect and continuous refinement. 
  • Why this matters: Recognition satisfies volunteers’ needs for reciprocity and deepens their commitment to the programme.   
  • Prioritise local adaptation and co-design. Development of the registry must include advisory panels composed of older volunteers to ensure that cultural sensitivities, language, and relational norms are fully incorporated into all materials and processes. 
  • Why this matters: Avoiding one-size-fits-all models guarantees that the programme resonates with local values and needs, ensuring relevance and inclusivity. 

Conclusion 

Volunteering in children’s hospitals is a form of managing compassion—a delicate, demanding, and vital relational labour. Designing the 65+ Volunteer Registry with psychological contract and emotional labour theories at its core provides a blueprint for building programmes that are both compassionate and sustainable. Rather than ‘bureaucratising kindness’, this approach makes the invisible visible: it names expectations, recognises emotional work, and builds supports that allow volunteers and hospitals alike to flourish. 

In doing so, the registry strengthens civil society by honouring the generosity of older volunteers and helping healthcare institutions harness that generosity without exhaustion or disenchantment. It embodies Forum’s vision of volunteerism as a resilient, relational infrastructure for challenging times. 

 

Dr. Isidora D. Mytilinaiou is an expert in volunteer management with extensive experience designing and leading initiatives across Greece and the UK. She has directed projects on volunteer recruitment, retention, and engagement, including blood donor campaigns and high-impact healthcare collaborations. Her work centres on strengthening healthcare support systems by enhancing the role and impact of volunteers, with a particular focus on children’s hospitals. Through her research and practice, she explores how volunteer management can improve the experiences of patients and families while ensuring sustainable and effective support for healthcare professionals.